ABSTRACT
Aim: The specific aim of the study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on nursing faculty experiences.Background: Academic nursing experiences were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is concern that the resulting stress threatens nursing faculty emotional well-being and reason to burnout.Method: A descriptive, quantitative study was conducted;exploring faculty academic and clinical roles during the COVID-19 pandemic by using structured, self designed, open-ended questionnaire to 401 institutionally attached nursing health professionals. The questionnaire includes various domains including Safety and Health, Challenges for teaching, clinical practise, supervision perception of institutional support provided;faculty burnout, satisfaction, and well-being.Results: Overall satisfaction with the working environment in the institutions with respect to total teaching experience showed a significant statistical. Participants perceived support from academic institutions and increased need to provide emotional support to students.Conclusion: Nursing faculty are essential to the profession. Nursing faculty require proactive and sustained institutional and personal support to provide exceptional ongoing education, build resilience, and support students.
ABSTRACT
Nursing is a profession that is inherently stressful with a high risk of burnout. During the COVID-19 outbreak, the risk of stress and burnout was even greater as nurses had to face insurmountable psychological pressure, especially those in education who continued to teach nursing students while simultaneously working at the bedside. The challenges of having to move in-person courses to online platforms and provide alternative clinical experiences for nursing students during a pandemic, while caring for critically ill COVID-19 patients, made them especially vulnerable to stress, burnout, and psychological issues. The purpose of this phenomenological qualitative study was to explore the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurses who were treating COVID-19 patients while teaching in first-year nursing programs. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 16 nursing faculty to participate in one-hour, semi-structured interviews. The health belief model was used to explain how nurses were impacted psychologically by the pandemic. The findings revealed that the overwhelming working conditions experienced by nurses at the bedside while treating COVID-19 patients led to high levels of stress, fear, and psychological and physical symptoms, whereas teaching helped them cope with the demands of their bedside role. The research highlighted how in education nurses felt motivated, inspired, valued, and supported, so teaching became a protective factor against the high levels of stress and feelings of burnout experienced at the bedside. This study emphasizes the need for hospital administrators to support nurses by fostering positive working environments that prioritize their physical and mental wellbeing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Academic programs are increasing simulation-based learning in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 pandemic; however, there is limited knowledge about these universities' simulation culture readiness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore faculty perceptions of the readiness to integrate simulation into nursing programs. METHODS: This cross-sectional correlational study recruited faculty members in four nursing colleges at Saudi universities using the simulation culture organizational readiness survey 36-item questionnaire. A total of 88 faculty members from four Saudi universities were included. Descriptive, Pearson's correlation, independent sample t-test, and analysis of covariance analysis were utilized in this study. RESULTS: Nearly 39.8% and 38.6% of the participants had Moderately and Very Much overall readiness for the simulation-based education (SBE), respectively. There were significant correlations between the summary impression on simulation culture readiness measures and simulation culture organizational readiness survey subscales (p < 0.001). Three simulation culture organizational readiness survey subscales (defined need and support for change, readiness for culture change, and time, personnel, and resource readiness) and the overall readiness for SBE were correlated with age, years since highest degree, years of experience in academia, and years using simulation in teaching (p < 0.05). The sustainability practices to embed culture subscale and summary impression were only correlated significantly with the number of years using simulation in teaching (p = 0.016 and 0.022, respectively). Females had a significantly higher mean in the sustainability practices to embed culture subscale (p = 0.006) and the overall readiness for simulation-based education (p = 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant differences among the highest degree in the overall readiness for SBE (p = 0.026), summary impression (p = 0.001), the defined need and support subscale (p = 0.05), the sustainability practices to embed culture subscale (p = 0.029), and the time, personnel, and resource readiness subscale (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Favorable simulation culture readiness results suggest great opportunities to advance clinical competencies in academic curricula and optimize educational outcomes. Nurse academic leaders should identify needs and resources to enhance simulation readiness and encourage the integration of simulation in nursing education.
ABSTRACT
Nurse educators meet frequently in conference settings and peer groups seeking an answer to "How do you do clinical?". The purpose of this qualitative, phenomenological study was to explore faculty perceptions of clinical teaching experiences at the patient bedside at a level one or two associate's degree nursing program by faculty within the Virginia Community College System (VCCS) that teach a rural student population.Rural students struggle with work-life barriers that complicate their educational journey. This was compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic that presented new challenges to the way nursing education could be delivered creating a need for on line and blended learning environments. Many programs experienced a shutdown of clinical teaching facilities and were forced online. This new learning environment proved to be another educational challenge for rural healthcare communities. This study explored faculty perceptions with interview sessions addressing clinical teaching practice over the last five years at the patient bedside with eight nurse educators from VCCS rural community colleges. A literature review revealed gaps in the research;the utilization of a comprehensive clinical teaching model and an overall disagreement on any one "best" teaching method. Three research questions on the teaching of clinical reasoning, safe patient care outcomes, and the experiences of new teaching environments during the COVID -19 pandemic were developed. Following hermeneutic analysis, the primary themes of Collaborative Teaching Practices, Traditional Teaching Methods, and Pandemic Teaching emerged with secondary themes of Concept Based Curriculum and Blended Learning Environments. Academic nursing leaders and faculty should use this information to create a common clinical teaching model. Health care leaders should use this information to enhance bedside teaching practices to produce safe outcomes for patients in their care. Nursing educators should use this information to make strong clinical thinkers that will address the growing need for nurses in the United States in the wake of the most significant nursing shortage experienced in this profession. This hermeneutic phenomenology is the beginning of a much-needed change in clinical education. Nurse educators must develop critical reasoning skills in nurses that will care for an aging population using innovative methods for critical thought. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated incidents of burnout among academics in various fields and disciplines. Although burnout has been the subject of extensive research, few studies have focused on nursing faculty. This study aimed to investigate the differences in burnout scores among nursing faculty members in Canada. (2) Method: Using a descriptive cross-sectional design, data were collected via an online survey in summer 2021 using the Maslach Burnout Inventory general survey and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. (3) Result: Faculty members (n = 645) with full-time employment status, worked more than 45 h, and taught 3-4 courses reported high burnout (score ≥ 3) compared to those teaching 1-2 courses. Although education levels, tenure status or rank, being on a graduate committee, or the percentage of hours dedicated to research and services were considered important personal and contextual factors, they were not associated with burnout. (4) Conclusions: Findings suggest that burnout manifests differently among faculty and at varying degrees. As such, targeted approaches based on individual and workload characteristics should be employed to address burnout and build resilience among faculty to improve retention and sustain the workforce.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Humans , Faculty, Nursing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Job SatisfactionABSTRACT
Introduction: Even before COVID-19, enrolments in online postgraduate nursing and midwifery courses were growing globally. Teaching into planned online courses requires pedagogical considerations unique to the context. Objective: The objective of this descriptive mixed methods study was to understand the experiences and needs of Australian online educators who taught into planned online postgraduate nursing or midwifery courses. Methods: A 55-item online survey captured the experiences and needs of participants. This paper reports on the analysis of participants' qualitative responses in this survey, analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Forty-nine postgraduate educators participated in this study. Results: Five core themes were identified: time is precious; redefining the educator role; understanding the pedagogical shift; online and alone; and learning to teach online. Many educators report lacking the skills and confidence to deliver high-quality education to postgraduate students through their fingertips. Conclusion: This research highlighted that online educators need support through resources, education, and professional development.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic generated a disruption in the modality of face-to-face education, forcing an abrupt migration to virtuality with little or no prior preparation, which makes it necessary to analyze the perception and satisfaction of teachers with the development of activities in this format. Objective: to analyze the perception and satisfaction with education in virtual modality during the COVID-19 pandemic of the teachers of the Nursing Degree of the University Institute of the Argentine Federal Police of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Methods: a descriptive, cross-sectional, and quantitative study was designed. The sample consisted of 23 teachers who responded to an instrument consisting of 21 questions with closed response options. Results: the mean age was 52 years (SD: 10), 87 % were women and 79,9 % have children, 56,5 % are teachers of third-year subjects of the curriculum and 56,5 % have a degree level of training. 65,2 % mentioned that in virtuality their main difficulty was the resistance of students to turn on their cameras and 43,5 % perceive the qualifications obtained in virtuality as equivalent to face-to-face. Those who possessed a postgraduate degree (p=0,005) and those who wished to continue virtual activities after isolation (p=0,041) were found to have higher levels of satisfaction. Conclusions: an average level of satisfaction was found with a score of 6.8 out of 10 and the perception of the virtual modality for the development of classes during the pandemic was positive. © 2023, Publicacion de la Asociacion Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Academic nursing research is at a critical impasse after the great retirement and resignation during COVID-19. Sustaining and replenishing senior nurse-scientist faculty that are clinical experts with real-world clinical practice is critical. Leveraging the mission of nursing scholarship within the business of building and sustaining externally funded research enterprises in schools of nursing presents conundrums, especially with persistent nursing faculty vacancies. PURPOSE AND METHODS: Through a lens of intersectionality within the context of academic bias and nursing education regulation, we address challenges in NIH funding for nurse-scientist faculty. Publicly available data reveal equity, inclusion, and advancement issues that make it an unequal playing field for nurse-scientist faculty if expected to achieve similar NIH funding as faculty in schools of public health and medicine. DISCUSSION: Understanding research enterprises requires appreciation of the complex interplay between academic nursing units, university infrastructures, and academic budgetary models. Creative support for both nursing deans and their faculty is needed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Nursing , Nursing Research , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Fellowships and Scholarships , Public Health , Faculty, NursingABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the world in 2020. Every country adopted quarantine measures to prevent the transmission of the coronavirus infection. These measures resulted in dramatic changes in the daily lives of most people. In the academic world, students faced a shift from the traditional classroom-based teaching to virtual distance learning platforms. This shift in nursing education posed challenges both to the instructors and students as they were not fully prepared for this transition. Objective: The study assessed the nursing students' satisfaction with the virtual learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in selected nursing colleges in India. Methods: The study was conducted in four nursing colleges in India. A total of 1,166 Diploma, Post Basic BSc (N), BSN, and MSN nursing students participated in the study. Ethical approval was obtained from all the nursing colleges included in the study. The Google Forms satisfaction survey included student, teacher, course, technology, environmental, and practical dimensions. Results: The response rate was 86.31% (n = 1,166). The overall satisfaction with virtual theory and practical classes has a mean and SD score of 67.14 + 11 and 16.21 + 3.46, respectively. The results showed that overall 51% of the students had good satisfaction with virtual theory classes while 48% had moderate satisfaction. In terms of overall satisfaction with virtual practical classes, approximately 39% had good satisfaction, 58% had moderate satisfaction and nearly 3% had poor satisfaction. In addition, the students expressed that they had good satisfaction with Teacher dimension (64.3%), Student dimension (63%), and Course dimension (57.2%). On the contrary, they expressed poor satisfaction in the Technical dimension (11.3%) and Environmental dimension (5.6%). The results showed that the courses, the place of attending class, and health issues were significantly associated with the student's level of satisfaction with virtual learning. Conclusion: Although the majority of the students rated their satisfaction level as being "good" in virtual theory classes and "moderate" in virtual practical learning, most of them were dissatisfied with the Technical and Environmental dimensions of virtual learning. This results calls for blended learning strategies to be designed to enhance better learning outcomes and, to ensure deepened level of satisfaction with virtual learning activities.
ABSTRACT
This article aims to apprehend the present elements in the social representation of faculty development (FD) in higher education in health areas. FD is understood as a set of institutional tools that enable teachers to carry out a multiplicity of action to support their pedagogical practice. Social representation research with a qualitative approach. The research took place at three higher education institutions on southern Brazil, with faculty members from the undergraduate courses in Nursing (10) and Medicine (11), totaling 21. The production of data took place through in-person and online semi-structured interviews (COVID-19). The analysis technique followed Moscovici's metodological steps, through two processes of Social Representation formation: objectification and anchoring. It is concluded that the FD process is shown to the personal and professional growth of those who commit to it, providing the development of critical-reflective thinking.
ABSTRACT
This article aims to apprehend the present elements in the social representation of faculty development (FD) in higher education in health areas. FD is understood as a set of institutional tools that enable teachers to carry out a multiplicity of action to support their pedagogical practice. Social representation research with a qualitative approach. The research took place at three higher education institutions on southern Brazil, with faculty members from the undergraduate courses in Nursing (10) and Medicine (11), totaling 21. The production of data took place through in-person and online semi-structured interviews (COVID-19). The analysis technique followed Moscovici's methodological steps, through two processes of Social Representation formation: objectification and anchoring. It is concluded that the FD process is shown to the personal and professional growth of those who commit to it, providing the development of critical-reflective thinking.
ABSTRACT
Nurse educators meet frequently in conference settings and peer groups seeking an answer to "How do you do clinical?". The purpose of this qualitative, phenomenological study was to explore faculty perceptions of clinical teaching experiences at the patient bedside at a level one or two associate's degree nursing program by faculty within the Virginia Community College System (VCCS) that teach a rural student population.Rural students struggle with work-life barriers that complicate their educational journey. This was compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic that presented new challenges to the way nursing education could be delivered creating a need for on line and blended learning environments. Many programs experienced a shutdown of clinical teaching facilities and were forced online. This new learning environment proved to be another educational challenge for rural healthcare communities. This study explored faculty perceptions with interview sessions addressing clinical teaching practice over the last five years at the patient bedside with eight nurse educators from VCCS rural community colleges. A literature review revealed gaps in the research;the utilization of a comprehensive clinical teaching model and an overall disagreement on any one "best" teaching method. Three research questions on the teaching of clinical reasoning, safe patient care outcomes, and the experiences of new teaching environments during the COVID -19 pandemic were developed. Following hermeneutic analysis, the primary themes of Collaborative Teaching Practices, Traditional Teaching Methods, and Pandemic Teaching emerged with secondary themes of Concept Based Curriculum and Blended Learning Environments. Academic nursing leaders and faculty should use this information to create a common clinical teaching model. Health care leaders should use this information to enhance bedside teaching practices to produce safe outcomes for patients in their care. Nursing educators should use this information to make strong clinical thinkers that will address the growing need for nurses in the United States in the wake of the most significant nursing shortage experienced in this profession. This hermeneutic phenomenology is the beginning of a much-needed change in clinical education. Nurse educators must develop critical reasoning skills in nurses that will care for an aging population using innovative methods for critical thought. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Social media provides us with easy access to information. For students, it is an additional learning resource used in different types of theoretical and practical teaching methodologies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was to describe the perspective of undergraduate nursing students on the use of Instagram during their clinical practicums in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive and exploratory study based on an interpretative framework. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: First-year undergraduate nursing students at the Universidad Europea de Madrid were included. METHODS: In-depth interviews and researchers' field notes were used to collect the data. Purposive sampling and inductive thematic analysis were applied. During the interviews, themes such as accompaniment during practicums or training opportunities were identified. RESULTS: The use of Instagram helped students to feel closer to professors, identifying it as an opportunity to remedy the possible lack of connection between theory and practice. Moreover, Instagram helped them build an image of nursing in clinical practicum environments. By using Instagram, undergraduate nursing students were able to better integrate and apply the knowledge acquired at university during their clinical practicums in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results can be applied to future studies on the use of social media platforms as teaching tools in clinical practicum settings and to observe the evolution of the image and role of nursing and its relationship with social media.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Students, Nursing , Humans , Preceptorship , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methods , Pandemics , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
Nursing professors must constantly interact with students, maintain a high level of professional performance, and meet targets and deadlines, even during a pandemic. Considering the changing educational environment, it is essential to identify contemporary limitations and problems to provide feedback for improvement. This study aimed to explore the laboratory and clinical teaching experiences of nursing professors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focus group interviews were conducted with professors from the nursing departments of universities in Korea. In total, 19 professors who had laboratory and clinical experience participated in this study. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis identified four themes. The themes included feeling helpless in the infection management system, uncertainty about the effectiveness of alternative practice training, acceptance of changes, and preparation for future practice training. As the necessity and possibility of non-face-to-face education have been confirmed by the pandemic, it is expected that classes using technology will be actively developed in nursing practice education. The roles and attitudes of teachers and educational institutions also need to change. Nursing professors should reflect upon and evaluate challenges to prepare for post-pandemic practical education.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Nursing , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Schools , UniversitiesABSTRACT
AIMS: 1. To identify approaches and strategies that can build research capacity among academics from the disciplines of nursing and midwifery working in tertiary education institutions. 2. To identify evidence-informed strategies that enable academic transformation of professional identity from clinician to researcher. BACKGROUND: Nurses and midwives are core to leading health practice and system change through research. Despite manifold efforts to build research capacity among nurse academics over the past two decades, there is scant evidence about what specific strategies are effective and few robust evaluations of any capacity building strategies. DESIGN: This scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework to identify key concepts and map the available evidence specifically related to volume, nature and characteristics. METHODS: The authors followed a scoping review framework and used a PRISMA flowchart to report findings. Electronic data bases (CINAHL, ERIC, Medline and Scopus) were searched between April and June 2020. Literature published between 2000 and 2020 was searched. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for data coding and extraction and all included papers were subsequently thematically analysed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies from seven countries met the inclusion criteria and were comprised of literature reviews (n = 4) case studies (n = 3) qualitative survey (n = 1) and intervention studies (n = 6). Four themes were identified as follows: academic identity, organisational changes, leadership and research skills development. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous evaluation of research capacity building strategies for academics from the disciplines of nursing and midwifery is a significant gap in the literature. To promulgate research among nurse and midwife academics, strong, supportive leadership and a range of inclusive and targeted approaches are needed. Significant work remains in terms of negotiating with the broader university to operationalise supportive systems and structures. Clarifying how self-concept has an impact on building and maintaining a research identity for nurse and midwife academics is an area worthy of further study. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Strong, supportive leadership with inclusive and targeted research skills development is key to reorienting academic nursing and midwifery research culture.
Subject(s)
Midwifery , Schools, Nursing , Capacity Building , Female , Humans , Leadership , Midwifery/education , Pregnancy , SchoolsABSTRACT
AIMS: To examine the effects of nursing deans/directors' transformational leadership behaviours on academic workplace culture, faculty burnout and job satisfaction. BACKGROUND: Transformational leadership is an imperative antecedent to organizational change, and employee well-being and performance. However, little has been espoused regarding the theoretical and empirical mechanisms by which transformational leaders improve the academic workplace culture and faculty retention. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey design was implemented. METHODS: Nursing faculty employed in Canadian academic settings were invited to complete an anonymous online survey in May-July 2021. A total of 645 useable surveys were included in the analyses. Descriptive statistics and reliability estimates were performed. The moderated mediation model was tested using structural equation modelling in the Analysis of Moment software v24.0. Bootstrap method was used to estimate total, direct and indirect effects. RESULT: The proposed study model was supported. Transformational leadership had both a strong direct effect on workplace culture and job satisfaction and an inverse direct effect on faculty burnout. While workplace culture mediated the effect of leadership on job satisfaction and burnout, the moderation effect of COVID-19 was not captured in the baseline model. CONCLUSION: The findings provide an in-depth understanding of the factors that affect nursing faculty wellness, and evidence that supportive workplace culture can serve as an adaptive mechanism through which transformational leaders can improve retention. A transformational dean/director can proactively shape the nature of the academic work environment to mitigate the risks of burnout and improve satisfaction and ultimately faculty retention even during an unforeseen event, such as a pandemic. IMPLICATION: Given the range of uncertainties associated with COVID-19, administrators should consider practicing transformational leadership behaviours as it is most likely to be effective, especially in times of uncertainty and chaos. In doing so, academic leaders can work towards equitable policies, plans and decisions and rebuild resources to address the immediate and long-term psychological and overall health impacts of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Faculty , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Leadership , Pandemics , Personal Satisfaction , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused extraordinary disruptions to education systems globally, forcing a rapid switch from conventional to online education. Although some qualitative studies have been carried out exploring the online education experiences of nursing students and faculty members during the COVID-19 pandemic, to our knowledge, no study has used the Photovoice approach. OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of nursing students and faculty members as related to online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: A descriptive qualitative design using Photovoice was adopted. SETTING: The study took place across five countries and one city in Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Hong Kong). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two nursing students and twenty-eight nursing faculty members who participated in online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Each participant submitted one photo substantiated with written reflections. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from institution-specific ethics boards. RESULTS: Three themes and eleven sub-themes emerged from the data. The three main themes were: 1) Psychological roadblocks to online education; 2) Developing resilience despite adversities; and 3) Online education: What worked and what did not. CONCLUSION: Through Photovoice, the reflections revealed that nursing students and faculty members were generally overwhelmed with the online education experience. At the same time, participants were satisfied with the flexibility and convenience, opportunities for professional and personal development and safety afforded by online education. However, concerns over academic integrity, practical skills and clinical competencies, engagement and participation, the duality of technology and social isolation out-shadowed the advantages. It is worthwhile to explore the concerns raised to enhance online education across the nursing curriculum.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance , Students, Nursing , Faculty, Nursing , Humans , Pandemics , Students, Nursing/psychologyABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical nurse educators within pre-licensure baccalaureate educational programs had to quickly adapt to new ways of teaching. Hospital-based clinicals no longer permitted students to attend and some schools of nursing (SON) transitioned to virtual simulation learning environments. These alternative learning strategies were imperative for students continued progression. The first purpose of this pilot study explored nursing faculty's perceived effectiveness of using vSim for Nursing® to replace clinical practice. A second purpose examined the effectiveness of faculty preparation. Effectiveness was evaluated using an adapted version of the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M). Mean scores indicated that faculty strongly agreed on its effectiveness for students' learning, with all items ranging 57.9%-97.4%. Majority of faculty strongly agreed that their preparation was highly effective, ranging 86.8%-97.4%. Faculty perceived vSim for Nursing® to be an effective tool for replacement of clinical practice and felt prepared to meet the students' learning outcomes. Evidence to support the effectiveness of vSim is needed so faculty can make data driven decisions to support student success in clinical practice. Debriefing continues to be a prominent component to any form of simulation. Supporting and preparing faculty to meet students' competencies further ensures successful transition as a professional.
ABSTRACT
The nursing shortage is creating a possible healthcare crisis. Future projections estimate that approximately 555,100 registered nurses will either retire or leave the labor force by 2022. Additionally, the total number of new registered nurses needed to either replace this population for new jobs is 1.3 million (American Nurses Association, 2014). Studies in nursing and related health care fields have shown that faculty interaction has fostered resilience of nursing students (Crombie, Brindley, Harris, Maran, and Thomas, 2013). Utilizing a mixed methods design, the purpose of this dissertation was to determine the levels of resilience in freshman, sophomore, junior, and senior undergraduate pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing students and investigate the influence of perceived faculty support on resilience at three undergraduate baccalaureate nursing programs in Pennsylvania and one undergraduate baccalaureate nursing program in New York. The Resilience Scale (Wagnild & Young, 1993) and the Perceived Faculty Support Scale (Shelton, 2000) were used for the quantitative portion of the study while the students were asked an open-ended question for the qualitative portion. The Model of Student Retention© was used as the conceptual model. Findings of the study revealed a slight positive relationship between perceived faculty support and resilience (rs = (199) = .16, p =. 027, two-tailed). The theme of encouragement was the most recurring theme for the qualitative question. Other themes that were discovered included accessibility, flexibility, counseling, and pedagogy. Several recommendations for future studies included continued research on faulty support in nursing education and discovering new interventions that can enhance faculty support with emphasis on the COVID - 19 pandemic, increased research on gender populations (faculty and students) that include the LBGTQ community, continued investigation of the relationship between faculty support and resilience, investigation of generational changes in nursing education between the Millennial, Gen X, Gen Y, and Gen Z generations, and larger longitudinal research studies of the same cohorts of students. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The interactions between work and personal life are important for ensuring well-being, especially during COVID-19 where the lines between work and home are blurred. Work-life interference/imbalance can result in work-related burnout, which has been shown to have negative effects on faculty members' physical and psychological health. Although our understanding of burnout has advanced considerably in recent years, little is known about the effects of burnout on nursing faculty turnover intentions and career satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: To test a hypothesized model examining the effects of work-life interference on nursing faculty burnout (emotional exhaustion and cynicism), turnover intentions and, ultimately, career satisfaction. DESIGN: A predictive cross-sectional design was used. SETTINGS: An online national survey of nursing faculty members was administered throughout Canada in summer 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing faculty who held full-time or part-time positions in Canadian academic settings were invited via email to participate in the study. METHODS: Data were collected from an anonymous survey housed on Qualtrics. Descriptive statistics and reliability estimates were computed. The hypothesized model was tested using structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Data suggest that work-life interference significantly increases burnout which contributes to both higher turnover intentions and lower career satisfaction. Turnover intentions, in turn, decrease career satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings add to the growing body of literature linking burnout to turnover and dissatisfaction, highlighting key antecedents and/or drivers of burnout among nurse academics. These results provide suggestions for suitable areas for the development of interventions and policies within the organizational structure to reduce the risk of burnout during and post-COVID-19 and improve faculty retention.